How We Were Formed

Our group originated from a casual discussion held by a few of us at the Limmud New York Learning conference in January of 2008. We realized there were very few means by which young professionals could effectively navigate and impact the philanthropic world. This struck us as odd, as we all aspired to one day be able to make significant donations, but were unsure when we were supposed to learn how to donate in an intelligent and effective way.

JPEG grew out of a desire to solve both of our problems at once. We recognized that as a group, we could teach each other and learn together about the process of giving. We also saw the practical benefits of giving together: we can effect greater change through a group donation than our small donations can individually.

Since January, we have met regularly and have established a corps of 13 committed members. We have discussed at length our visions for the structure of the group and the kinds of things we each hope to get out of it. We are now beginning to identify the organizations to which our group is interested in contributing.

The issue, of course, is that by entering with only limited information, there is only so much we can teach each other. Part of the learning process we envisioned involves educators from outside the group sharing their knowledge with us. While we possess a lot of energy and enthusiasm, none of us has previous experience participating in a giving circle, donating large sums of money, or teaching these things. We are looking to connect with experienced and inspirational people who can share their wisdom and insights with us, and help prepare a new generation of philanthropists.


Tuesday, August 12, 2008

Education Component: Amy teaches us about the nuances of giving.

At out most recent meeting JPEG member, Amy Schiller, facilitated a learning conversation about strategic philanthropy. This conversation served a dual role, giving us food for thought about how to be more strategic with our individual giving, as well providing us with a shared language about different philanthropic strategies as they relate to our group's grantmaking.

To illustrate her points, Amy shared two excerpts from Inspired Philanthropy, written by philanthropic advisor, Tracy Gary (www.inspiredlegacies.org).

Idea #1 Moving from "obligatory giving" to "inspired giving"

Here's the quick summary. Most of us give most of our charitable dollars to organizations we feel socially obligated to give to and give far less money to organizations we are most passionate about and which we believe have the power to be truly transformative.

Part of the process of us become more strategic in our individual giving involves turning this model upside down. This means investing the bulk of our philanthropic dollars with organizations we believe to be transformative and which we are most passionate about. Gifts we feel personally or socially obligated to make can still make the cut, but should be minimized.

Idea #2 Tracy Gary's Levels of Philanthropic Intervention

  • Needs Philanthropy (immediate and recurring needs)
  • Empowerment Philanthropy (empowers individuals to care for themselves)
  • Capacity-Building Philanthropy (expansion of services or growth of numbers served)
  • Systemic Philanthropy (develop systemic solutions to collective problems)

JPEG talked about the challenges and opportunities of each of the philanthropic levels. This shared language will be useful to us as we continue to evaluate prospective grantee organizations.

1 comment:

somens said...

Donate online through ICONTRIBUTE
which is a platform where you can select where and what impact you want to create.